300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua vs 338 Win Mag: Picking The Right Heavy Hitter. JavaScript is disabled. vs.7.62 NATO greenspun.com : LUSENET : MILDOT : One Thread Can anyone tell me the difference between the 7mm Rem.

For those reasons, the .308 Norma was extremely popular for a short time. We've got you covered.• .243 Winchester vs. 6mm Remington• 7x57mm Mauser vs. 7mm-08 Remington• .25-06 Remington vs. .257 Weatherby Magnum• .338 Winchester vs. .375 H&H Magnum• .30-30 Winchester vs. .35 Remington• .257 Roberts vs. .250-3000 Savage• .270 Winchester vs. .280 Remington• .35 Whelen vs. 9.3x62mm Mauser• .416 Rigby vs. .416 Remington Magnum• .308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield• .22 Nosler vs. .224 Valkyrie• .300 Win. Among others, the Remington Model 700, Browning X-Bolt, CZ-550, Mossberg Patriot, Nosler M48, Ruger M77 Hawkeye, Savage 11/111, Thompson Center Compass, Tikka T3X, Weatherby Mark V and Vanguard, and the Winchester Model 70 are all available in 7mm Remington Magnum and .300 Winchester Magnum. The first (I believe) is the 7mm Remington Magnum. They even used the case from the .338 Winchester Magnum (which was itself descended from the .375 H&H) as a model for the new cartridge. (I felt guilty, like I had betrayed an old friend, which my old 7mm is.)

Though both cartridges utilize .308″ bullets, the .300 Win Mag is also better suited for using heavier bullets in the 200-220 grain range than the .30-06.

This time period saw a wave of new belted magnum cartridges based on the .375 H&H Magnum (like the .264 Winchester Magnum, .338 Winchester Magnum, and .458 Winchester Magnum). The 7mm Remington Magnum drives the wide variety of 7mm bullets, from 120 to 175 grains, at respectable velocities.

“Extremely long” was a poor choice of words. I used the Hornady Ballistic calculator and Handloads.com to compare wind drift and recoil for the cartridges.

Do you spend a lot of time in the mountains or the backcountry mountain goat, sheep, or tahr hunting where it’s really nice to have a lightweight rifle? *Casing image above is an artist rendering and not a real photo of 7mm Remington Ultra Magnum Ballistics cartridge. The 7mm Remington Magnum drives the wide variety of 7mm bullets, from 120 to 175 grains, at respectable velocities. Not all 7mm's are the same. That’s not to diminish the capabilities of the .300 Winchester Magnum at all. Buy some outstanding .300 Winchester Magnum hunting ammo here. Along with lots of choices for ammunition, there is an abundance of great hunting rifles produced by nearly every big firearms manufacturer chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum and .300 Winchester Magnum. Are you sensitive to recoil? tominboise. The Lyman 50th Edition (p214-216 & 260-262), and Hornady 10th Edition (p406-411, 537, 545, & 574-585) reloading manuals were also used as references for this article. This is a tough one, as the comparisons between the 7mm bore diameter and the .308″ need to be carefully examined. I’ve used it with lead-free 150-grain bullets for African plains game, 180-grain bullets for a good number of species and 220-grain round nose bullets for bear and deer.

However, this is where the strengths and weaknesses of each cartridge start to diverge though. Both cartridges are belted magnums that utilize modified .375 H&H Magnum cases.

Additionally, it’s an extremely accurate cartridge that may even have a slight edge on the .30-06 in that regard.

If you like the idea of using one of these calibers for the bigger game animals, like Alaska/Yukon moose or brown/grizzly bear, I feel the .300 Win. It followed the Winchester recipe, with a 2.50″ case, but wasn't exactly an original design. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Or should I just stay with the 375 and download it for whitetails? Am I correct in thinking anything listed as 7mm is really a 7mm magnum?

At the same time, while the 7mm Rem Mag tops out with 175 grain bullets, the .300 Win Mag is capable of firing 200 grain, 208 grain, and 220 grain bullets with sectional densities of .301, .313, and .331 respectively. Like the .308 Norma, the .300 Winchester Magnum essentially duplicated the performance of the .300 H&H Magnum in a shorter case that fit in a standard length rifle action.

The velocities produced were understandably lower than those of the 7mm Remington Magnum—as the powders available in 1912 certainly weren’t the same as those in 1962—but the cartridges are nearly identical, with the H&H design having a bit more taper. Thoughts on a rifle in 7mm or 300? The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca and other Amazon stores worldwide.

For one thing, the cartridge enabled shooters to fire the same weight bullet a couple hundred feet per second faster than the .30-06 Springfield could.

Gun writers have spilled a lot of ink comparing the accuracy of the 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag over the years. I had a 7mm before, love the caliber, but sold the 700.

The smaller caliber 7mm Remington Magnum is wonderful for smaller and lighter animals like mule deer, pronghorn, or fallow deer.

Both make a great choice for elk, deer, African plains game and smaller bears, and both have the capability to be made in a mountain rifle for sheep and goats. Additionally, the smaller diameter .284″ bullets the 7mm Mag uses have a higher ballistic coefficient and more sectional density than .30 caliber bullets of the same weight used by the .30-06 Springfield.

But when hunting moose in Alaska I did go with a 300 WM for the bullet weight. Comparing the two, the .300 Win. But granted, in the field I don’t think I’ve ever felt any recoil at all. November 25, 2019. vs. .300 WSM• .223 Remington vs. .22-250 Remington, E-mail your comments/questions about this site to: EmediaHunter@nrahq.org, For questions/comments about American Hunter magazine, please e-mail:Publications@nrahq.org, You can contact the NRA via phone at: NRA Member Programs1-800-672-3888, To advertise on American Hunter, visit nramediakit.com for more information.

That said, the .375 Ruger is awesome too. Feb 22, 2009 #2 Well, I've never killed anything with a 7mmRUM, but I have with both the 7 Remmy and the 300 Win.

Not surprisingly, both cartridges have seen extensive use in long range shooting competitions and both are in common use among military and police snipers for precision shooting.

The popularity of magnum cartridges is undeniable; Americans have had a long love affair with speed, and I doubt that will end anytime soon.

The 7mm Remington Ultra Mag is the smallest of the Ultra Mag calibers. The .300 Win Mag has a slightly greater overall length (3.34″ vs 3.29″), but they are close enough in size that both cartridges are used in standard/long-action rifles. unseated the .264 Winchester Magnum rather quickly, becoming the darling of Western hunters. Apple | Google | iHeart | Spotify | Stitcher. Mag., the new .28 Nosler, and the over-the-top 7mm RUM—a shoot-off to find the best. That is why it is hunting, not using game as targets. The 7mm Remington Magnum was the first on the scene, released in 1962 in conjunction with the new Model 700 rifle. Friday, August 31, 2018. In fact, the .308 Norma and .300 Winchester Magnum are both very similar in terms of performance or overall cartridge size. Using a shortened .375 H&H Magnum case paired with a .284″ bullet, the 7mm Remington Magnum (often referred to as the 7mm Rem Mag, 7mm RM, or 7mm Mag) offered a significant ballistic improvement over the .30-06. All rights reserved.

Thank you help me make this decision, any info would be appreciated. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! That being said, both cartridges have a moderate recoil that most shooters should be able to handle. The first number is the value of this cartridge, and the last number is the value of the most powerful round in our bullet database. Norma followed suit, releasing their .308 Norma Magnum in 1960, giving the same ballistics as the longer .300 H&H Magnum, in a long-action cartridge.

The difference between them (7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag) isn’t as great as it is sometimes made out to be and the animal will never know the difference if your shot is placed in the right spot. All we like sheep have gone astray, we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. That being said,  even though they have a lot in common, and even though there is a big overlap in their capabilities, many hunters and shooters love to debate the pros and cons of the 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag. You see, just as the famous .375 H&H Magnum came onto the scene, Holland & Holland released the .275 H&H Magnum, with a 2.50″ case and the H&H Belt.

All other things equal, a heavier projectile of a given caliber will be longer and therefore have a higher sectional density and consequently penetrate deeper than projectiles with a lower mass and sectional density. The 300 seems to have a little more forgiveness.