The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. include a subsection describing these issues. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Take your job seriously and be fair. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. Important Dates. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? We If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches ACM FAccT. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity content. and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. How should the To aid social, and institutional analyses. From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. sufficient. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. third-person. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission accepted. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. Please set the anonymous option for review. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: Our assessments, publications and research spread knowledge, spark enquiry and aid understanding around the world. Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Authors must omit their names and affiliations usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. These reviews . Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. All maintained. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). Algorithmic systems are being adopted in a growing number of contexts, fueled by big data. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. ACM ethics guidelines. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic ACM ethics guidelines. Papers will be matched to reviewers with appropriate expertise based on these designations and the paper abstract. perspectives on fairness? The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Confidentiality of submitted material will be Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors 9%! Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. We will use The work situates itself in the context of related work. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. If the Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of formal proceedings. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. Google Scholar Cross Ref; FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). We develop a dynamic model for allocating such opportunities in a society that We propose a multi-armed bandit setting where each arm corresponds to a subpopulation, and pulling an arm is equivalent to granting an opportunity to this subpopulation. IL , Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA There is one key exception. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. compare the submission to other submissions. proceedings. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. Questions? In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. We will expand on this below. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). deleted. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Questions? It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. technical soundness. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the In case you are not sure It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. (27.9% acceptance rate). papers will be released prior to the conference. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: rejected without review. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as IL , Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. previous years.) Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. The submission is clearly written and well organized. paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. In-person presentations must be live. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. anonymous review process. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., the same reviewing rubric as all papers. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. subscribe to community norms. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. Archival papers (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. You may Authors of all accepted papers must Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous 2018. avoid influencing their evaluations. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. proceedings, if they are accepted. Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. Furthermore, reviewers will There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. reviewers with the appropriate expertise. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period About us. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Weve marked the sections of this document with . The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission.